Credit: Mercedes Mehling / Unsplash

The mission of our public schools encompasses far more than shepherding students from early childhood to adulthood while teaching reading, writing and arithmetic. Our schools must prepare our children — all our children — for engaged citizenship in a diverse contemporary society, not to mention the 21st century workplace. Teachers and administrators also must provide students with a safe, supportive and inclusive learning environment, a mandate laid out for California schools by the School Success and Opportunity Act.

The “parental rights” movement endangers all of that in pursuit of far-right ideology. For years, we’ve watched extremists push school districts to allow parents to “make their own curricula” in history, civics, literature, science and sexual health.

Now they hope to strip away the safety and support some students who identify as transgender or non-binary seek from teachers and counselors when they can’t count on a supportive environment at home. Their mechanisms are Assembly Bill 1314, almost certain to be rejected by the California Legislature, and a new lawsuit filed on behalf of two middle school teachers in Escondido. Both would force schools to reveal information to parents against students’ wishes — essentially “outing” them.

We expect lawmakers will maintain our schools as safe harbors, where students have rights and can confide in adults they trust. California’s courts should do the same.

We are supportive parents of trans young people who’ve attended schools in Thousand Oaks’ Conejo Valley Unified School District — a district that, unfortunately, has been one of California’s epicenters for bigotry against LGBTQ+ youth. Megan is the parent of an 8-year-old transgender daughter who socially transitioned at the age of 4. Jon’s son is a college student who began hormone treatments and underwent top surgery during high school.

We have helped our loved ones navigate their public-school environments while advocating for the rights of other trans and nonbinary students. Sadly, during that time we have witnessed the struggles of more than a few students whose parents denied them the gender affirmation they need.

We’ve seen parents refuse to use a student’s personal pronouns, provide the clothing of their child’s expressed gender or facilitate therapeutic counseling. Too many times we’ve watched students deal with emotional or physical abuse; we’ve even helped students find new places to live after their parents kicked them out.

Such negative outcomes are too common after students “come out” to uncomprehending or intolerant parents. Then there are kids who, because their parents have expressed prejudice in the past (or even mistreated them for other reasons), don’t believe they can confide in their parents in the first place.

School is often where young people express new ideas, explore new passions and, yes, experiment with their identities — not just because they’re surrounded by supportive friends, but because teachers and administrators nurture critical thinking, creativity and innovation. Often, educators who spark our kids’ imaginations become the adults they trust the most.

It’s clearly not the role of teachers or counselors to recommend medical treatments for gender dysphoria, or to take the place of a qualified therapist. However, listening and offering advice to students who question their gender identity — and excusing absences for therapy and treatments that students seek on their own — are entirely appropriate. They do not constitute “grooming,” in the current, ugly anti-LGBTQ parlance.

Studies repeatedly show that even one adult providing support to a trans or non-binary student can make a lifesaving difference. And particularly when such students don’t believe they can find affirmation at home, teachers, counselors and administrators must help them feel supported and safe at school.

If that requires educators to shield information from parents while they abide by a student’s request to call them by a new name, use different pronouns and help them exist authentically at school, then schools must take all those actions. California law on the subject applies across every grade level, as it should.

Hopefully, as that support is provided, students will be counseled to find a way to inform their parents themselves. As in all matters related to a student’s emerging gender identity, the school should follow the student’s lead, not the other way around.

Of course, the optimal scenario is always the one in which trans/nonbinary students can partner with supportive parents and educators to live as they identify. But when that’s unrealistic, our schools must prioritize their students’ need for affirming support and privacy, not to mention emotional and physical safety, over parents’ desire to impose their ideology or prejudices upon their child.

That’s not just state law — it’s the right thing to do.

•••

Megan Goebel is founder of the LGBTQ+ advocacy groups Navigating Gray and Unity Conejo, and chairs the Conejo Valley USD’s LGBTQ+ Advisory Council. Jon Cummings is co-founder of the advocacy group Indivisible: Conejo.

The opinions expressed in this commentary represent those of the authors. EdSource welcomes commentaries representing diverse points of view. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (10)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. John H 4 days ago4 days ago

    Hiding a student’s trans status from their parents requires teachers to use a set of name and pronoun with the student and deliberately switch to another set while corresponding with the parents. It is then not just “not telling” the parents. It is an active effort to deceive by the state.

  2. Mike R 2 weeks ago2 weeks ago

    Why? Why must we "prioritize" a tiny fraction of a percent of the population at the expense of the entire education system and every other child in it? Schools are not mental health clinics and educators are unqualified to deal with mental health issues of the magnitude of gender dysphoria. Parents and doctors are the appropriate parties to deal with children and their mental health. What schools must prioritize is teaching fundamentals like reading, writing, … Read More

    Why? Why must we “prioritize” a tiny fraction of a percent of the population at the expense of the entire education system and every other child in it? Schools are not mental health clinics and educators are unqualified to deal with mental health issues of the magnitude of gender dysphoria. Parents and doctors are the appropriate parties to deal with children and their mental health. What schools must prioritize is teaching fundamentals like reading, writing, logic, math, and scientific principles.

  3. Todd Ellison 2 weeks ago2 weeks ago

    First off, protecting natural born women and their right to have their own spaces and sports is not far right ideology it's called common sense. Secondly, every parent of a child has every right to know whats going on at their school. Thirdly, you are a part of the problem if you believe that there being 20x the number of people identifying with this compared to the last generation is natural. Children are sponges and … Read More

    First off, protecting natural born women and their right to have their own spaces and sports is not far right ideology it’s called common sense. Secondly, every parent of a child has every right to know whats going on at their school. Thirdly, you are a part of the problem if you believe that there being 20x the number of people identifying with this compared to the last generation is natural.

    Children are sponges and absorb all the garbage they see on tv and media. If a child is under 18, they can’t smoke, drink, get a tattoo, vote, serve in the military among other things because they are not mentally capable of making life affecting decisions like that yet you agree with mutilating surgeries and hormone replacement.

    I think you need to look up the meaning of the word hypocrisy before the government changes the meaning of that word, too.

  4. Jeff 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    These are not our kids. Parents send their kids to school so we can teach them the fundamentals. What makes teachers think they know better than a student’s parents? Let’s leave the parenting to our students’ parents. Would any teacher who is a parent like it if their child’s teacher was teaching teaching them things they wouldn’t allow at home? These kids are not our property and I didn’t sign up to lie to parents.

  5. FG 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    Parents provide for kids: we pay for medical bills, provide love, food and shelter. Parents do have rights, we are families and our kids are with us for the long run; teachers and school are a fraction of the time. While not all families are perfect, it is abhorrent to see schools thinking they know more than parents and hide information. Families should have an option to opt out of public schools (we really … Read More

    Parents provide for kids: we pay for medical bills, provide love, food and shelter. Parents do have rights, we are families and our kids are with us for the long run; teachers and school are a fraction of the time. While not all families are perfect, it is abhorrent to see schools thinking they know more than parents and hide information.

    Families should have an option to opt out of public schools (we really need school of choice in CA). Top surgery is a mastectomy, it is a serious medical procedure and you can’t really “attach them back.” You are removing a body part that is working.

    If a student identifies as a blind person, will you be OK to make him blind? What if the child decides to de-trans (something that the trans society is hiding and even bullying who has an opinion). I would really encourage readers to check happened to Chloe Cloe and other de-trans kids.

    There is no scientific discussion or consensus on NB, but this has been pushed very quickly, with very little scientific research and in many cases threats as some voice concern over this. Learn from the past when lobotomy was promoted as the solution and damaged several kids forever.

    Read about John Money and how the term “gender identity” was coined.

    Schools need to support academics and, based on national results, we can see how CA is failing in education, because it is busy in promoting agendas.

    Replies

    • Eleanor 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

      Everything you said is wrong. Thankfully, California is governed by more enlightened people.

  6. Michael 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    It is certainly not “far right” ideology that opposes hiding from parents their child’s personal information that’s already known to schools. And when one considers that current California law allows minors to undergo permanent and highly risky trans medical procedures WITHOUT the consent of their parent, then of course parents should not intentionally be left in the dark about their own children.

  7. Marsha 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    Thank you so much for this timely, sensitive and critically important piece. Trans and NB students need support and people to confide in, and those people are not always their parents. Every child has the right to feel safe at school.

  8. Eleanor 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    Too many parents think their children are their property. Thank you for sharing your stories and the truth. Thankfully we live in California where student privacy will be protected.

  9. Paul Muench 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    First do no harm. Only parents really know if they will be a danger to their child. In that regard it might be better for the safety of children for schools to follow the lead of parents. Doing the right thing is not always the safe thing. I think this is almost universally acknowledged advice on the coming out process. Encouraging children to lower their guards may not work out well in every case.