Courtesy: Jenna Hewitt-King
Jenna Hewitt-King teaches English learner students who have recently arrived in the United States as part of her high school's newcomer program.

Fifteen sets of teenage eyes stared blankly at me as I introduced myself on the first day of school. I was teaching a course that was part of a brand-new program in my district. I knew the students in front of me were seniors slated to graduate in the spring. I knew that I was providing instruction to English learners.

What I didn’t know was that these students were “newcomers,” a term that refers to a student who has only been in the U.S. for three years or less. I’d come to learn that some of the students in my classroom had only been here for mere months.

What became clear at this moment was that the expectation to simply “teach what I would normally teach seniors” was not only unrealistic, but inequitable and — frankly — problematic. I walked into that class believing that these students already had some foundational English language skills. Most did not.

I was overwhelmed, and I could only imagine how the students were feeling. When I asked them, Carlos, a student from Mexico, said: “I feel very uncomfortable without words to talk.” Sergio, another student from Mexico, described feeling “very strange and sad.” Danny — a student from Guatemala who hadn’t been in school since the fourth grade — shared that he “[did not] understand and can’t learn English very quickly.” Danny, like every other student in the class, was relying solely on Google Translate for his education, which was particularly difficult for him because his home language literacy level was also low. (The students are real and their quotes verbatim, but I have changed their names to protect their privacy.)

I felt as if I had been set up for failure. And the worst part is that despite my feeling that I was not qualified to teach this class, I technically am because I have an English Learner Authorization with my teaching credential. Yet, I was nowhere near prepared to lead this group of students toward proficiency in the 12th grade English language arts standards. Danny needed a teacher familiar with teaching strategies that are effective in foundational language acquisition; someone who can break down the language in a way that is clear and intentional. Not only was I not well versed at this level of teaching literacy, but I only speak English and have zero experience in translation.

In California, teachers like me are placed in schools and assigned English language development courses without having much professional development or hands-on experience applying the skills we learned with students. For example, during my credential program, I took a one-semester course about teaching strategies for language-learning students. I have very little memory of this course. Maybe because it was one of seven courses I took at once; or because I was also teaching in a classroom for the first time ever; or because I was overwhelmed by the pressure to pass my teaching exams. Whatever it is, I know that a single course offering was not enough for me to feel confident in my ability to teach students like Danny.

Since I’ve started teaching, it has become abundantly clear to me that we need more direct policies and specific guidance from the state for budding newcomer programs like the one at my school. These policies must start by defining what “newcomer” means so that data can be better disaggregated to determine the needs of language-learning students. Additionally, state policy should determine what curriculum and/or best practices should be used in these programs to ensure that teachers like me are equipped with the tools we need to teach these courses. I am thrilled to see that Assemblymember Kevin McCarty, D-Sacramento, has introduced Assembly Bill 714 to do just that.

Finally, I believe that without changes made to the English learner instructional authorization process, teachers like me will continue to be placed in classrooms with newcomer students without adequate professional development or support. This current process allows districts to check the box for having a groundbreaking “newcomer program” without any accountability that the program is being led effectively, equitably or, as the California English Learner Roadmap mandates, provides meaningful access for students.

Without more explicit guidance, expectations and support from the state, how can we expect schools and districts to build programs up to the capacity that will best serve some of our most vulnerable students in California?

When I see Carlos, Sergio, and Danny each day in my class, I know they deserve better than what I am offering them at this moment; it is time for our state leaders to see this too.

•••

Jenna Hewitt King is a high school English teacher at San Leandro High School in San Leandro, California. She is a 2022-23 Teach Plus California Senior Policy Fellow

The opinions expressed in this commentary represent those of the author. EdSource welcomes commentaries representing diverse points of view. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (8)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Shawn English 2 months ago2 months ago

    Thank you so much for writing this. As a former San Leandro high teacher of English learners, who watched the program be pared down to practically nothing by the time I left in 2013, and who has recently watched the same phenomena occur in my current district, New Haven Unified, I sympathize with your situation. The same thing is happening all over, and the sad truth is, it is the kids who suffer the most. … Read More

    Thank you so much for writing this. As a former San Leandro high teacher of English learners, who watched the program be pared down to practically nothing by the time I left in 2013, and who has recently watched the same phenomena occur in my current district, New Haven Unified, I sympathize with your situation.

    The same thing is happening all over, and the sad truth is, it is the kids who suffer the most. We used to have a tiered, research based language acquisition program at my school, it’s actually what I was hired to do, but, in the past two years, the district has taken the stance that all English learners, except for our newcomers, should be mainstreamed for the “sake of equity,” which is coded language for “We need to check boxes.”

    Thank you for having the courage to write this op ed. I made sure to forward it to all of the “powers that be” over here in Union City in the hopes that maybe at least one of them will read it and take note. It’s good to see that there is some movement at the state level to mitigate the harm of such practices. State/federal reform is the only way that we are going to get district level management to budge on this stuff. Thanks again and keep up the good fight!

    Replies

    • Jenna Hewitt King 2 months ago2 months ago

      Thanks for engaging with the article, Shawn! So many teachers are feeling disappointed in how our state and districts are supporting (or not) newcomers and multi-lingual students. It’s extra disappointing when considering how many people in our state are multi-lingual! If anyone is doing it right it should be California, yet here we are.

      Teachers like you give me hope! Keep doing the good work.

  2. Dr. Bill Conrad 2 months ago2 months ago

    Truly a heart-rending story. But tragically not uncommon. English Learner Programs on the cheap. Many school districts are all hat and no cattle when it comes to English Language Programs! Not to mention the racist nature of the programs. One can only imagine if white children had a basic need to learn academic Spanish and were offered a teacher who only spoke English. Beyond imagination. And insufficient funding and staffing of EL programs is by design. … Read More

    Truly a heart-rending story. But tragically not uncommon. English Learner Programs on the cheap. Many school districts are all hat and no cattle when it comes to English Language Programs!

    Not to mention the racist nature of the programs. One can only imagine if white children had a basic need to learn academic Spanish and were offered a teacher who only spoke English. Beyond imagination.

    And insufficient funding and staffing of EL programs is by design. State and federal funding can be redirected to all manner of school district pet projects and funding for families and friends.

    School districts also skimp at the administrative levels as well. When I worked for Santa Clara Unified, they had hired a support staff and secretary to run their EL program. The program consisted of teachers filling out numerous forms to ensure “compliance.”

    It would be best for the teacher to engage students on their phones in online language programs like Babel or Khan Academy to provide at least minimal language acquisition support. You should also report the district to state EL compliance authorities. Don’t go it alone as it is a crime.

    Replies

    • Jenna Hewitt King 2 months ago2 months ago

      Thanks for engaging with the article, Dr. Conrad!

      I agree that usually these EL Coordinator type positions are just box checkers. I know the person who was brought in to support our programming in the last few years has done very little to support me in the every day work I do with students, which is what’s important (not test scores!).

  3. John Kriewall 2 months ago2 months ago

    Dear Ms Jenna Hewitt King–Thank you for writing about your experience with these children. I, as a non-educator, wonder what I can do to support your quest to let interested people like me understand the dilemma you’ve described? Who in the educational hierarchy needs to to take action on your behalf?

    Replies

    • Jenna Hewitt King 2 months ago2 months ago

      Thanks for the comment, John! I think there are multiple levels of action that need to happen in order for real change to occur. In the article I mention an assembly bill (AB 714) that will be heard by the Assembly Education Committee tomorrow 3/29 at 1:30pm. I'm not sure if there is an option to make an online comment, unfortunately, but if you are in Sacramento you can comment in person. Aside from that … Read More

      Thanks for the comment, John! I think there are multiple levels of action that need to happen in order for real change to occur. In the article I mention an assembly bill (AB 714) that will be heard by the Assembly Education Committee tomorrow 3/29 at 1:30pm. I’m not sure if there is an option to make an online comment, unfortunately, but if you are in Sacramento you can comment in person. Aside from that policy, I think the best way that people can support these students is by asking questions at their district about what policies, programs, and supports exist for newcomer students. Be aware of what’s happening and don’t be afraid to ask questions about how these programs are working (or not). Districts often make decisions and changes without informing the public, especially when it pertains to a small group of students like newcomers. Thanks for all you do to support CA public schools!

  4. Eduardo Munoz-Munoz, PhD. 2 months ago2 months ago

    Thank you for this commentary and your work for newcomers. Spot on, particularly, when it comes to "check the box for having a groundbreaking “newcomer program” without any accountability." As the former District English Learner Advisory Committee (DELAC) president in San Leandro Unified, a group of English learner parent leaders and I saw how the district discriminated against English Learners in San Leandro High by "dumping" ELs of all proficiencies into a "newcomer program" … Read More

    Thank you for this commentary and your work for newcomers. Spot on, particularly, when it comes to “check the box for having a groundbreaking “newcomer program” without any accountability.” As the former District English Learner Advisory Committee (DELAC) president in San Leandro Unified, a group of English learner parent leaders and I saw how the district discriminated against English Learners in San Leandro High by “dumping” ELs of all proficiencies into a “newcomer program” without entry or exit criteria, from at least as far back as 2012 until 2021. “Discrimination” is not an opinion, but the word used by the California Department of Education when they resolved our appeal favorably to us (the district and its attorneys, at huge cost to taxpayers, denied the obvious). However, both the district and the CDE denied our requested remedy that parents be informed of the damage caused to them (they required “training” for administrators instead). These students and families at San Leandro High never knew what happened to them. With this lack of accountability, most likely not being an exception among districts, our newcomers and ELs in general are left to sink or swim at their own peril (in a sea of lip service). Legislation is indeed needed requiring that parents are informed when the CDE finds discrimination (which does, all the time, based on its own reports) so that the rights of English Learners are honored. Thank you, Ms. Hewitt King, for your service and courageous words.

    Replies

    • Jenna Hewitt King 2 months ago2 months ago

      Thanks for the comment, Eduardo! Firstly, thank you for your service as DELAC president. It is so important that we have strong representatives who are not afraid to advocate on behalf of our students. I hadn't thought about what kind of communication is happening with newcomer families in regards to what the students are experiencing in our schools and classrooms. It breaks my heart to think about how many students have come and gone without … Read More

      Thanks for the comment, Eduardo! Firstly, thank you for your service as DELAC president. It is so important that we have strong representatives who are not afraid to advocate on behalf of our students. I hadn’t thought about what kind of communication is happening with newcomer families in regards to what the students are experiencing in our schools and classrooms. It breaks my heart to think about how many students have come and gone without being aware of what our programs were and were not doing for them. I think your policy recommendation is spot on! Thanks for sharing.